Money and other status signals make a man SEXIER. Not just a better provider.
Females were 1000 times more sensitive than males to economic status cues when rating opposite sex attractiveness, indicating that higher economic status can offset lower physical attractiveness in men much more easily than in women”
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109051381730315X
If it were true that all signals of being a valuable provider only inspired segregated practical emotions, why do the most attractive fertile women work so hard to please men on yachts?
Why do women fuck for “fun” on “one night stands” rich men more often? Because there is no emotional barrier of k/r strategy. Capable providers are ALSO more sexy.
Emotions follow opportunity. For women, this includes sexual arousal, and orgasm.
You can be handsome at a party and have no game, but then, “it’s your game to fuckup and lose” Being handsome is not enough. Money is not enough. But they are real variables, with real moistening effects.
Your desire for fake it until you make it confidence can also make you insensitive to competing in the real world. This can be easily amplified by sharing stories with other men who are faking it and have not made it.
Statistics are your friend. Your online community can not fuck you.
Random Xpat Rantings 
I remember asking you ages ago if you compensated your much younger ladies and you said they were attracted to the guy with the money, not just to the money itself.
I’ve seen it in a few cases. First, there’s a fancy bar in Tokyo where local girls like to pick up rich foreigners. A female colleague wondered, why do they bother? They don’t get the money just for spending the night with him. Might as well fuck a hot poor guy. But like you said, they just love the Rich Guy vibe. I had an ex who used to be into that scene, but that’s a whole ‘nother and rather sad story.
In another case, I found that girls in the Philippines are attracted to white guys who they see as rich, but they’ll happily shag you without any expectation of getting any of it for themselves. The proximity to wealth is attractive enough.
I get tired to repeat that the color green is not red.
I’d like a small bit of credit for standing up to the in group think of a few small communities, but actually, any one of us can look at a few old black and white movies – dating to the talkies. There is no new red pill community.
Human nature has not been recently discovered by guys walking the streets.
Themes.
Repeating themes.
If they keep repeating throughout cultures and ages, then they are themes.
I think you’ll like this finding:
“And, last, we found that once men and women found sufficient rates of attractiveness for their short-term partners, they care about the intelligence of their partner.”
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886918306032?via%3Dihub&fbclid=IwAR2bIVbhfkXqTzNuMrVDCNkT3q54jiERC8U7hFcjctWfPuOq2ycK3eASwYg
A lot of the factors that are attractive in long term partners are also attractive in short term hookups as long as basic primal attraction is there.
“why do the most attractive fertile women work so hard to please men on yachts?”
because they are prostitutes getting paid for a job.
Ok, that’s valid. But it’s a very thin interpretation of human motivation. Almost an autistic interpretation. Yes, humans prefer benefit. Yes, humans have real emotions.
You imply that emotions and benefit never can intersect.
riddle me this xsplat. I live in SEA and see daily old rich guys with younger gf – but they don’t actually like the guy. They day dream daily about young handsom guys fucking them hard and fast – and will cheat on their old “sponsor” ( boyfriend is just a lie ) as soon as they can.
And its not just old guys – young guys who are missing the looks compensate with money and get the same treatment.
If money is so great why are all these rich guys just being used and thrown away?
Meanwhile handsome thugs in $100 apartments are getting true love?
I don’t get the riddle. I don’t understand your question.
Or maybe you are trying to say that because there is black that there can’t be white?