Random Xpat Rantings

Contemplative dominance for the modern man

If she claims she’s ever been slipped a roofie, she has BPD and is lying.

Posted by xsplat on July 12, 2013

From RVF

Manystyles said: …Well during an LMR (last minute resistance) bout in bed she says something about why she can’t have sex. She finishes the roofie story saying how she woke up in a hotel room alone and got tested with traces of the roofie chemical along with trauma to her vag area. She starts crying. Lays against me. At this point i gave up trying.

iknowexactly says: I think she’s dangerously insane, for real.

YOU Might end up being the one she accuses of “roofie” rape.

What are the chances of a roofie story being true Vs the chances of some unstable chick feeling bad about a hookup and “embellishing” the story. ? How much do “roofie incidents” really, actually happen? That’s a major fucking felony, you’re going away for 10 years for that shit. Maybe it happens 1/10,000 times? What’s the incidence of an irresponsible girl drinking too much, getting a blackout and SPECULATING she was roofied? 1/400?
Fake tits are another indicator of instability.

I would say avoid completely. Verdict= personality disorder.

paninaro Wrote: I’d like to see some real data on how often roofies are actually used. I bet it’s extremely rare to come across them in emergency rooms, or even cases of trafficking in the drug itself.

From daily mail article: Quote:Date-rape drugs are largely an urban myth used as an excuse by women who booze themselves into a stupor, it has been claimed.

They are willing to ‘hide behind’ the idea that a stranger poured poison in their drink – rather than face up to the fact that they had simply been binge drinking.

Interviews with more than 200 female students in and around London revealed they often mistakenly linked sickness, blackouts and dizziness to poisoning by a stranger, when excessive alcohol consumption is much more likely to be the cause.


Dr Adam Burgess, from the University of Kent school of social policy, said rumours about the prevalence of date-rape drugs were little more than an urban myth.


More than half of those in the survey said they knew someone who claimed to have had drugs slipped into their drink.

But despite such popular beliefs, police have found no evidence that rape victims are commonly drugged with substances such as rohypnol.

Dr Burgess said: ‘There have hardly been any cases where it has been proved that sedatives such as rohypnol and GHB have been used in a rape incident. Yet it has been a storyline that has appeared in virtually every TV soap.

‘Maybe that tells us something about the programmes these women are watching. But it is concerning that women are more concerned about something that is incredibly unlikely ever to happen to them.’

And here’s a medical study:

From 2nd dailymail article: Quote:Women who claim to be victims of ‘date-rape’ drugs such as Rohypnol have in fact been rendered helpless by binge-drinking, says a study by doctors.

They found no evidence that any woman seeking help from emergency doctors because their drinks were allegedly spiked had actually been given these drugs.

Around one in five tested positive for recreational drugs while two-thirds had been drinking heavily.

The findings further erode the theory that there is widespread use of Rohypnol and GHB, another drug said to be favoured by predatory rapists.

Last month a personal safety campaigner claimed that Rohypnol had never been used to assist a sexual assault in the UK. Doctors carrying out the latest study at the Wrexham Maelor Hospital said it was far more likely women were claiming their drinks had been spiked as an “excuse” for binge-drinking.

The 12-month study was based on 75 patients – mostly women – treated in casualty who told doctors their drinks had been tampered with in pubs or clubs.

But tests for drugs such as Rohypnol, GHB and ketamine found nothing, says the study published in the Emergency Medicine Journal.

MrXY said: Yet again we see women refusing to be accountable for their actions, making false accusations, and blaming men for their bad behavior.

6 Responses to “If she claims she’s ever been slipped a roofie, she has BPD and is lying.”

  1. […] xsplat.wordpress.com […]

  2. YouSoWould said

    Do the vast majority of girls use “I was date raped” as an excuse for their irresponsible binge drinking? Yes.

    Does this mean that no-one has, or will ever be drugged and sexually assaulted? No, of course not.

    Not addressing you specifically here, but I think the manosphere would benefit from choosing its language carefully over this issue. “No-one has ever been date raped” is an unnecessarily inflammatory stance, and almost certainly not true. That RoK article was idiotic.

    • xsplat said

      The quotes were from a Rooshvforum discussion. No one claimed that “no-one has ever been date raped”. Did you read it that way?

      What was said is that (chances are) if she claims that she has been given roofies as the means to date rape her, then she is lying and has a personality disorder.

      The (chances are) part can be left unsaid and assumed, given the context of the arguments.

      I can’t see how an honest reading could leave anyone to conclude that I believe that NO ONE has ever been given roofies. That’s not what this article is about.

      There is no need to have tip toe perfect all-clauses accounted for logic in every sentence. The obvious logical assumptions are assumed. We are not kindergardeners here. The readers of this blog are (nearly all) intelligent. See what I did there? The (nearly all) could be left out, as it would in normal conversation simply be implied and assumed.

      You’ve probably noticed how women are fond of the NAWALT arugment, and use it to dissimulate. Whenever a generalization is made, they try to refute it by pointing out how not ALL examples of that generalization are true.

      There is no need to cater to such NAWALT arguments. Ordinary language with ordinary generalizations is understood by ordinary people.

      Even if the PC police are watching over your shoulder, eager to correct every move your mouth makes, fuck em. There is no need to pre-edit our speech for them. We know what a generalization is, and we know when it is being made. We don’t have to preface every sentence with “in general” and “mostly”.

    • xsplat said

      I made the same point in my recent entrepreneur-ice-cream post:

      “People do not want to be entrepreneurs. And as we all know deep down, when a blanket statement is made, it always means “in general” unless specifically otherwise stated.”

  3. […] comment I made on his article entitled “If she claims she’s ever been slipped a roofie, she has BPD and is lying.“, in which he references a Roosh V forum posting (which I admittedly mistook for a different […]

  4. […] If she claims she’s ever been slipped a roofie, she has BPD and is lying. « Random Xpat Rantings […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 158 other followers

%d bloggers like this: