Using money as mojo to enhance your pull
Posted by xsplat on March 5, 2013
As I’m getting older, I find that my tastes in women does not age. Every few years a new generation of hotties is jiggling in the clubs, and that’s the generation I target.
That doesn’t change, but my appearance does. My relative strengths shift around. I’m pushing late forties, my appearance is declining and my income is increasing. Because what I can offer that women want is changing, how I see women is changing. It no longer bothers me to pay for an apartment for a side piece. It no longer bothers me that girls look towards men with a calculating eye.
Yes, I realize that the rules are different for one night stands. That’s what a lot of guys are into, and so that’s how they see the entire dance between men and women. All about being the man that women want to have a one night stand with. The alpha as opposed to the provider. That’s a very distorted view that uses a prism to shatter light into component colors, until people can no long even cognize the idea of an alpha provider. It’s alpha cad or beta family man dad, or it’s a playboy rogue who is fucking the providers girl on the side. Real black and white thinking.
Come on man. You can use your full knowledge of ALL the buttons and triggers that women have to manipulate them in so many more ways than are just related to night club pickup and pump and dump.
You can get them emotionally AND financially dependent upon you, and make love slaves out of them. Have them sexually addicted. Have them compulsively thinking about you for days, weeks, months, and even years upon years at a time. The game of reeling women in to your world is about so much more than being the most alpha guy on the dance floor.
Finances can, if they are your strength and you know how to use them well, play a fantastic role in bringing women into your world and keeping them there.
Scientific studies have been done that prove that women orgasm harder and more often for wealthy men.
And yet with the regularity of a superstitious Catholic crossing himself at the sight of a black cat crossing his path, we always here “Ya, but!” after every mention of any effective non-game trait. Quick! Hurry! Protect yourself from evil thoughts of effective competitive sexual strategies! “Ya, but!”
I guess it has to do with people identifying with whatever is their strength, and not wanting to view other strengths as real competition.
People will defend their sexual strategy by conjuring up images of apples and oranges. Comparing the best of what a dominant charismatic man can look like against the worst a rich man can look, to see who wins. Bill Gates vs an MMA fighter.
If you want to know the effect of money on attraction, isolate the variable. Compare female access, attraction, and compliance to a broke Bill Gates as compared to a rich and famous Bill Gates.
I’m sure if we put our minds to it, we can come up with many ways to spend and invest money that improve logistics and increase genuine sexual interest. Whole industries are built around making it easier for guys to peackock with money. Table service is said to help.
However studies have been done where you show the same picture of a man to a woman and ask her to rate his sexual attractiveness, and guage her reaction based on verbal and non-verbal cues. When you give a back-story to the man as wealthy, he is shown to be physically more appealing to the woman. Just the back-story itself is a variable in sexual attraction.
But there are ways to get and keep women interested that go beyond peackocking accessories and back-story. Guys have been keeping mistresses on the side by paying for 2nd apartments since as long human society has had apartments.
Is that beta? Are the girls gold diggers? Whatever. It’s a girl on demand in an apartment you can afford.
I pay the expenses for my live in girlfriends when I have them. I put them to work for me, and so pay less than I would any employee, but cash is involved. As it should be. What, I should take years of her precious youth and beauty and leave her with no reconpense at all? Youth and beauty is a financial asset. That should be recognized. That’s a major blindspot of western inculturated men. Let’s get real. Money SHOULD be involved.
There is nothing beta about having financial hand over your girl. Paying her expenses gives you hand. It’s a great setup if you can afford it.
I plan on doing more and more of it. One day I’ll even give them houses and cars and have 50 of them make babies for me.
I understand you guys are in a different culture, where women are expected to be self-supported. I’m not in that culture. I don’t have to say “you made your feminist bed, now sleep in it”, or “you wanted equality, now you have it”. They don’t want equality here.
And neither do I. Equality does not work to my advantage. Using my vast income differential does.
I realize that guys brought up in the matrix of the West just aren’t going to have the frame of reference to be able to see, and are not going to want to see, how financial hand can minimize the options of the woman and increase her sexual attraction and emotional bonding to the man.
Women love opportunistically. Be her best opportunity. Use whatever tools you have.