We all know how extremely complicated instincts can get, by watching the behavior of freshly hatched animals.
Women also have the most amazingly specific genetically encoded instincts. Whenever someone is critical of women as a group, a self appointed representative of all females will automatically come back with something like “If you disagree with the female stance, watch out, because WE will not fuck you, and we can declare you as unfuckable”. “If you disagree with women it means you are angry at women because women aren’t fucking you”. Or more simply “No girl would want to fuck you because you have a small dick”. Somehow these aren’t just memes – these come backs are hard coded into DNA. I’m not joking. It’s an instinct. Be critical of women and women will attempt to slander your sexual attractiveness and claim to have God like cock blocking powers.
Random Xpat Rantings 
Shit like this is supposed to make me shake my head in disgruntled agreement, but for some reason this made me laugh.
Because we all know that female’s brains and vaginas agree with each other.
Men think with their dicks…women think with their uterus.
I guess it’s similar to how groups of women in bars and such will essentially cockblock all the non-alpha men. Even when a woman in a group sees a regular guy who she thinks is kinda “cute” or whatever, she won’t want him if her friends disapprove of him. (“You like him??? That dork? Eww… you can do better girl, don’t settle for him”, etc.)
That’s why PUAs talk about gaming the whole table of women, instead of just the girl you want. If her friends aren’t attracted to you then she won’t be either.
In the end, it’s not right or wrong, or fair or unfair… it just IS. It’s best to accept the reality for what it is and adapt and adjust to it.
So what should we do xsplat? Agree with them? Adopt the feminist agenda?
I’m not sure. Sometimes it’s fine to ignore them, sometimes it makes sense to blow apart their arguments in way that shames them.
I’ve been reading http://therawness.com/ lately, and he has many articles on narcissism. Recently he’s been talking of how comedians deal with narcissist hecklers. Seems to me that women and many SE Asians tend to be emotionally developmentally impaired and narcissist. So according to Ricky Raw at the Rawness, the only way to prevent the narcissist from receiving a drama fix that they spin into an ego boost is to shame them – to make them feel inferior about who they are as a person. Not about what they said or did, but about who they are. So when a girl claims the man must have a small dick if he:
* likes younger women
* doesn’t want to pay for all dinner dates
* insists on being the dominant head of his household
* refuses to marry
or otherwise doesn’t buckle down to the womans agenda, rather than address her absurd claim, you could either sidestep it, or just totally destroy her emotionally. Ridicule to the point where she looks like daft twat that she is.
On the privateman blog a while back I went so far as to call one girl a daft twat. I’m not trying to fuck her, and her obstruction of a mens conversation was annoying, so I just called her out on it.
Ricky Raw points out that you have to make yourself into the kind of person who can enjoy negative drama, or who can at least tolerate it, and he warns that this is a very high price to pay for dealing with narcissists, and therefore advises that the best option is usually to just avoid them and shut them out of ones life completely. But I doubt we can avoid them or shut them out. And since most of the time we aren’t trying to fuck them, then making them feel stupid and inferior seems to be the way to go.
For the task I like the word choice “silly twat” over “stupid cunt”, as it still calls them a vagina, which really annoys women as it’s a way to call them out for being a walking female agenda, but twat is less harsh sounding than cunt. Silly twat won’t provoke as much rage as stupid cunt, but it says basically the same thing, in a way that is less affrontive and is funnier.
But some women are capable of rational thought. The problem is that when it comes to introspection that leads to thoughts of having a negative female image, women’s brains are wired to be unable to have those thoughts. Again, it’s similar to how a narcissist thinks. A negative self conception is actively avoided, and the thinking process just will not go there. So even when rational women try, they wind up saying something like “that’s very interesting and you have some good points, I’ll have to think about it more later”. Which they don’t.
An example of a woman capable of rational thought who is not capable of being critical of the female agenda is Susan of the hookingupsmart blog. Rollo lampoons her regularly. Men would like to think that Susan has a choice in the matter, and could correct her wrong headed views when they are pointed out, but she literally can not. It’s not physically possible. Her female brain wiring can not function that way.
This is why I say that when dealing with women, it’s important to physically and financially have hand. They should be powerless to make important decisions. I know that’s difficult to set up, in any age, and especially the modern one. But I don’t see any other way. They really can’t think well, and so should not be allowed responsibilities, when it affects the man.
If we can’t change their female headed thinking, we can at least work to limit the damage that they can do with it. Avoid the furies that even hell doesn’t have by limiting financial and legal exposure and having a mobile lifestyle. Remain financially anonymous even within live in relationships. Don’t marry, and so on. Women are fucking dangerous loons, and we know it.
So what to do? Maximize pleasure and minimize risk.
This should be a blog post on its own.
I agree wiht Kuraje. Great post xsplat. Thank you.
To get married is a stupid choice. I still can’t understand why people insist on this contract. Maybe fear or desperation? Ingorance?
Why people get married? Here are some guesses:
* We do that when we are still in love. That messes with our heads.
* Women can be very influential in the decision, and it will come down to a choice of marrying the woman you love and want to be with forever (that’s the love speaking), or having her leave
* Monogamy lowers testosterone and builds up oxytocin related bonds, leaving the man less impelled to seek novelty and more comfortable in a domestic role.
* A desire to avoid the haranguing of the jealous girlfriend
* Inertia plus a lack of time and energy and logistics to find and date new girls
* A lack of experience with easily getting girls of similar quality, and a lack of experience with seeing relationships devolve over time.
* A low socio-sexual orientation that values stability over novelty
* A desire to build an empire of family
Xsplat, do you think you could give a couple examples of cases where an otherwise rational woman’s thinking would be blocked by a negative female image, whereas a man’s wouldn’t be?
I’m genuinely curious, because I’ve worked through the initial pain (for this very reason, obviously) of reading manosphere blogs, and can read through posts like this one with only a brief flair of ‘No! NAWALT!’, but even though I can overcome it quickly and easily now it still never fails to show up. I’m wondering what manifestations of that I might be missing and could try to work on.
Also, (again in an otherwise rational woman) where do you see this psychological feature being a problem for decision making?
Happy New Year, Xsplat. I have a post suggestion. Back in April you wrote, “I’ll try write more on this difficult and touchy subject [chi-kung/tantra] in the future, by giving more detailed instructions for individual practices.” I’d like to start my new year by practicing some of those exercises.
I’d like to hear more about this, too. Specifically, what simple exercises could a complete beginner start with? If its a 10-minute exercise on Youtube, I’d start right away, if it’s just a vague idea to explore chi-king I’ll probably never begin.
Hopefully another reader will jump in here with some advice and links.
I just do a few simple forms that I’ve embelished. I studied a few different forms of chi-kung with various teachers, but stuck with doing just a few of the practices. In class we never really talked about our personal experiences. Mine changed dramatically over time. I guess a lot of what happens is very personal, and the forms are just a way to get you focused on your kinesthetic feelings, and shifting them around. Some people do a very simple practice, like just standing with their arms out in front of them as if holding a big tree – but they say that over time that practice can be profound.
The different forms will do different things, but it seems that progress is dependent on getting into it deeply and regularly.
I enjoyed learning in group settings, and in my city in the US 12 years ago there were classes available through resident and visiting teachers. Otherwise bookstores will have videos for sale, and ya – youtube probably has tons of info by now.
Again, I think some of the other readers here will have some good pointers.
Pingback: Daily Linkage – January 2, 2013 | The Second Estate
DrT start with Robert Bruce’s Ways of Energy and focus on the tactile touch, he explains.
By either
stroking
spiraling
squeezing
wrapping
you can feel energy starting with your big toe stretching through toes and then hands.
What he does is scratch a meridian up his leg and arm and focus on transferring that energy into his tan tien.
just don’t take them seriously.
I always agree with women – even when they say we won’t have sex. I agree with them as I f**k them and they have no problem with it. Just like I agree with them when I say that I won’t c*m inside of them… Gotta love the short attention span of women.
What does it cost me to agree with them when I’m getting what I want out of the deal? I just do what I want – saying words costs me nothing as long as it gets her to go along.
And that, my friend, is how the joke’s on them. No cad deep down is genuinely agreeing with them, he’s just good at creating a harmonious atmosphere.
Ya, agree with her words, escalate with her body.